Start a full AI courtroom simulation with a compatible case and role
Master evidence rules with timed drills and AI feedback
Organize case facts, dates, evidence, and witness notes into a trial timeline
Generate structured opening statements for your case
Complete guide to objections under Federal Rules of Evidence
Free practice resources for law students and attorneys
Courtroom terms explained with examples and FAQs
Compare evidence rules and jury procedures by state
Choose from civil and criminal mock trial cases with evidence, witnesses, attorney roles, and AI courtroom simulation.
Two vehicles collided at a busy intersection. Each driver claims the other ran a red light. The plaintiff seeks 80% liability while the police report assigns equal fault. A suspicious 3-second dashcam freeze and a missing defendant dashcam complicate the evidence.
Buyer purchased a "certified pre-owned" SUV that developed transmission failure within 30 days. The dealership refuses a full refund, blaming driver misuse. A disputed vehicle history report and conflicting mechanic opinions put the burden of proof at center stage.
Plaintiff Jennifer Huang was rear-ended by defendant Carlos Medina while stopped at a red light. Huang claims severe injuries requiring surgery; Medina admits fault for the collision but disputes the extent of injuries, arguing pre-existing conditions and exaggerated damages. A classic accident lawyer case focused on damages.
Plaintiff Maria Gonzalez alleges her obstetrician Dr. David Chen failed to perform a timely C-section despite signs of fetal distress, resulting in her newborn suffering Erb's palsy (brachial plexus injury). The hospital and doctor deny negligence, claiming the injury was an unavoidable complication of shoulder dystocia. Conflicting expert opinions on the standard of care make this a classic medical malpractice battle.
A tenant claims mold, heat outages, and ignored repair requests forced her family out of an apartment. The landlord counters that rent was already unpaid and the tenant blocked access for repairs.
A homeowner alleges her insurer unreasonably denied hurricane roof damage despite adjuster warnings. The insurer says the roof failed from wear, poor maintenance, and excluded seepage.
Plaintiff Sandra Okafor slipped on a wet floor in a grocery store and tore her ACL, incurring $62,000 in medical bills. The store claims a warning cone was present and Sandra was distracted by her phone. Deleted surveillance footage and conflicting witnesses make fault hotly disputed.
NovaTech Solutions delivered a custom CRM platform 4 months late. RetailMax Inc. sues for $480,000 in liquidated damages and $85,000 in consequential losses. The dispute centers on whether scope creep caused the delay or NovaTech simply underperformed.
Please select a role and case first
