Choose Your Mock Trial Role and Case

Two vehicles collided at a busy intersection. Each driver claims the other ran a red light. The plaintiff seeks 80% liability while the police report assigns equal fault. A suspicious 3-second dashcam freeze and a missing defendant dashcam complicate the evidence.

Buyer purchased a "certified pre-owned" SUV that developed transmission failure within 30 days. The dealership refuses a full refund, blaming driver misuse. A disputed vehicle history report and conflicting mechanic opinions put the burden of proof at center stage.

Plaintiff Jennifer Huang was rear-ended by defendant Carlos Medina while stopped at a red light. Huang claims severe injuries requiring surgery; Medina admits fault for the collision but disputes the extent of injuries, arguing pre-existing conditions and exaggerated damages. A classic accident lawyer case focused on damages.

Plaintiff Maria Gonzalez alleges her obstetrician Dr. David Chen failed to perform a timely C-section despite signs of fetal distress, resulting in her newborn suffering Erb's palsy (brachial plexus injury). The hospital and doctor deny negligence, claiming the injury was an unavoidable complication of shoulder dystocia. Conflicting expert opinions on the standard of care make this a classic medical malpractice battle.

Plaintiff Sandra Okafor slipped on a wet floor in a grocery store and tore her ACL, incurring $62,000 in medical bills. The store claims a warning cone was present and Sandra was distracted by her phone. Deleted surveillance footage and conflicting witnesses make fault hotly disputed.

NovaTech Solutions delivered a custom CRM platform 4 months late. RetailMax Inc. sues for $480,000 in liquidated damages and $85,000 in consequential losses. The dispute centers on whether scope creep caused the delay or NovaTech simply underperformed.

Plaintiff Andre Williams suffered second-degree burns and lost his apartment when his VoltRide X3 electric scooter's lithium-ion battery ignited during charging. He sues the manufacturer under strict liability and negligence, alleging a design defect in the battery management system. VoltRide claims Williams used a third-party charger that caused the thermal runaway. A prior CPSC complaint and internal engineering emails complicate the defense.

Plaintiff Dr. Linda Park (age 52, senior software engineer) was terminated during a company-wide "reduction in force" at CloudScale Technologies. She alleges age discrimination under the ADEA and sex discrimination under Title VII, claiming the layoff disproportionately targeted older women in engineering while younger male employees with lower performance ratings were retained. CloudScale asserts the RIF was based on legitimate business criteria including role elimination and skills alignment.