The work product doctrine most frequently arises during discovery disputes. When a party requests documents that include attorney notes, memoranda, case strategy outlines, or witness interview summaries, the responding party asserts work product protection. Unlike attorney-client privilege, work product protection belongs to the attorney and can only be overcome — for ordinary work product — by demonstrating substantial need and the inability to obtain substantially equivalent materials through other means. Opinion work product, such as an attorney's mental impressions about case strategy or assessments of witness credibility, is virtually never discoverable. Courts carefully distinguish between documents created "in anticipation of litigation" and those created in the ordinary course of business.
Attorney: "We object to this document request and assert work product protection. These memoranda were prepared by counsel in anticipation of litigation and contain mental impressions and legal theories regarding case strategy."
Judge: "I find that the opposing party has demonstrated substantial need for the factual portions of the investigation report. However, I will order the redaction of all attorney mental impressions, conclusions, and strategy notes before production."
Attorney: "Your Honor, these witness interview notes were prepared by my paralegal at my direction specifically to prepare for this litigation. They constitute core work product containing my mental impressions about witness credibility."
Students often conflate the work product doctrine with attorney-client privilege. Work product protects litigation preparation materials regardless of whether they involve client communications. A document can be privileged, work product, both, or neither. The protections have different elements, different exceptions, and different waiver standards.
Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 (1947)
Established the work product doctrine, holding that materials prepared by an attorney in anticipation of litigation are generally protected from discovery to preserve the adversary system.
United States v. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225 (1975)
Extended work product protection to criminal cases and held that the doctrine protects materials prepared by non-attorney agents (such as investigators) working at the attorney's direction.
In re Cendant Corp. Sec. Litig., 343 F.3d 658 (3d Cir. 2003)
Held that disclosure of work product to a government agency during an investigation waives protection as to all adversaries if the disclosure substantially increases the likelihood of the material reaching an adversary.
What is the difference between ordinary and opinion work product?
Ordinary work product consists of factual materials prepared in anticipation of litigation and can be overcome by a showing of substantial need and inability to obtain the equivalent without undue hardship. Opinion work product — containing mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, and legal theories of counsel — receives near-absolute protection and is virtually never discoverable.
When does the work product doctrine apply?
The work product doctrine applies to materials prepared "in anticipation of litigation" by or for an attorney. The key question is whether the document was prepared because of the prospect of litigation. Documents created in the ordinary course of business do not qualify, even if litigation later ensues.
Can work product protection be overcome?
Ordinary (factual) work product can be overcome if the requesting party demonstrates substantial need for the materials and inability to obtain their substantial equivalent by other means without undue hardship. Opinion work product, however, receives near-absolute protection and is almost never discoverable.
Privilege is a rule of evidence that protects certain communications from compelled disclosure in le...
Discovery is the pretrial process by which parties obtain information and evidence from each other a...
A deposition is a form of discovery in which a witness gives sworn testimony outside of court, typic...
A motion in limine is a pretrial motion asking the court to rule on the admissibility of evidence be...
