On February 2, 2025, a fire destroyed Ellis Storage Warehouse in Portland. Owner Martin Ellis had increased the property insurance limit from $600,000 to $1.4 million three weeks earlier after losing two major tenants. Fire investigators found two burn patterns near the loading dock and a lab reported medium petroleum distillate on floor debris. Ellis says he was at a restaurant across town and that the building had old wiring near the dock. Prosecutors charge first-degree arson and insurance fraud attempt, arguing Ellis staged the fire for money.
Fire origin and cause report
The fire marshal report identifies two separate areas of origin near the loading dock and describes pour-pattern indicators. Defense expert says post-flashover conditions can create misleading patterns and that electrical wiring in the same area was not fully ruled out. Trial use: Supports intentional-set origin through multiple burn areas, while post-flashover effects and electrical complaints create defense alternatives. Foundation: The sponsoring expert should explain qualifications, source data, method, assumptions, and whether the opinion reliably fits the disputed issue. Cross-examination focus: Expert Methodology FRE 702.
Accelerant laboratory report
The state lab found medium petroleum distillate in debris sample A-17. Chain-of-custody logs show the sample bag was stored near equipment that had gasoline residue from a prior vehicle fire investigation. Trial use: Links debris to accelerant, but storage near gasoline-contaminated equipment creates chain-of-custody and contamination attacks. Foundation: A collecting officer or evidence custodian should identify where it was found, how it was packaged, and each chain-of-custody handoff. Cross-examination focus: Chain of Custody FRE 901.
Insurance policy increase records
Ellis raised coverage to $1.4 million on January 10 after two tenants terminated leases. The defense says the insurance agent recommended replacement-cost coverage because construction prices had risen. Trial use: Shows financial motive through recent coverage increase, while replacement-cost advice and construction inflation offer innocent explanations. Foundation: A custodian, author, recipient, or investigator should authenticate when it was made, how it was preserved, and how it connects to the disputed event. Cross-examination focus: Prejudicial Impact FRE 403.
Restaurant receipt and phone location
Ellis paid at a restaurant 6.8 miles away at 8:42 PM. The first fire alarm triggered at 8:51 PM. Cell records place his phone near the restaurant until 9:03 PM, but prosecutors argue an accomplice or delayed ignition is possible. Trial use: Provides alibi-like timing and phone location, but prosecutors can argue accomplice use or delayed ignition to preserve opportunity. Foundation: A custodian, author, recipient, or investigator should authenticate when it was made, how it was preserved, and how it connects to the disputed event. Cross-examination focus: Relevance Dispute FRE 401.
Electrical maintenance complaints
Two tenants emailed about flickering lights and breaker trips near the loading dock in December 2024. A repair invoice shows a contractor inspected but deferred full panel replacement. Trial use: Supports accidental electrical-origin theory, while deferred repairs and complaint timing must still explain separate origins and burn patterns. Foundation: A custodian, author, recipient, or investigator should authenticate when it was made, how it was preserved, and how it connects to the disputed event. Cross-examination focus: Hearsay Risk FRE 803.
Deputy Fire Marshal Renee Holt (prosecution)
Certified fire investigator with 14 years of origin-and-cause experience
The fire had two separate origins and chemical indicators consistent with an ignitable liquid. Electrical failure did not explain both burn areas. Combined with the recent insurance increase, this was an intentionally set fire.
Martin Ellis (defendant)
Warehouse owner charged with arson
I was at dinner when the fire started. The building had electrical problems, and I increased insurance because my agent told me I was underinsured. I would never burn down my own business.
Dr. Helen Marquez (defense fire expert)
Electrical engineer and fire reconstruction consultant
The wiring near the loading dock showed arcing damage, and the alleged pour patterns are unreliable after flashover. The sample contamination risk makes the accelerant result weak.
Warehouse Arson with Disputed Accelerant — Portland, OR
Choose a role to start
