MockTrialOnline - Practice Mock Trial Online with AIMockTrialOnline
  • Pricing
  • Contact Us
Limited Free
Product
AI Mock Trial SimulatorSelect a CasePricing
Resources
BlogMock Trial ToolsObjection TypesOpening Statement BuilderCase Chronology BuilderLegal Glossary50-State Trial Rules
Company
About UsContact Us
Useful Links
CourtListener (Free Law Project)U.S. Supreme Court
Privacy PolicyTerms of Service
MockTrialOnline on Findly ToolsMockTrialOnline on Twelve Tools
Home/Legal Glossary/Privilege

Privilege

/ˈprɪvəlɪdʒ/
EvidenceLegal Rule: Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 501 (common law governs privilege in federal courts); various state statutes

Etymology & Origins: From Latin 'privilegium' meaning 'a law affecting an individual,' from 'privus' (private) + 'lex' (law). Originally referred to a special legal right granted to a specific person.

Privilege Meaning

Privilege is a rule of evidence that protects certain communications from compelled disclosure in legal proceedings. Privileges exist to promote socially valuable relationships by ensuring that communications within those relationships remain confidential. The most recognized privileges include attorney-client privilege, spousal privilege, physician-patient privilege, psychotherapist-patient privilege, and clergy-penitent privilege. Privileges can be waived by the holder.

In the Courtroom

When a question or document request intrudes upon privileged communications, the holder of the privilege (or counsel on their behalf) asserts the privilege as a basis for refusing to answer or produce documents. The burden is on the party claiming privilege to establish that the communication falls within the privilege's scope. In discovery, parties produce privilege logs identifying documents withheld on privilege grounds. Courts conduct in camera review when privilege claims are disputed. Importantly, privilege can be waived by voluntary disclosure to third parties or by failing to take reasonable steps to prevent disclosure. The crime-fraud exception defeats attorney-client privilege when the communication was made to further a crime or fraud.

Privilege in a Sentence

1

Attorney: "I instruct my client not to answer that question on the basis of attorney-client privilege. The question seeks disclosure of a confidential communication between counsel and client made for the purpose of obtaining legal advice."

2

Judge: "The crime-fraud exception applies here. The evidence shows the defendant consulted his attorney specifically to facilitate the fraudulent transfer of assets. The privilege does not protect communications in furtherance of a crime."

3

Opposing Counsel: "Your Honor, the privilege has been waived. The defendant disclosed the substance of this communication to a third-party business partner who had no role in the legal representation."

Common Mistakes

Students frequently confuse privilege with the work-product doctrine. Privilege protects communications between attorney and client; work-product protects materials prepared in anticipation of litigation. They have different scopes, different exceptions, and different waiver rules.

Federal vs. State Differences

Attorney-client privilege and spousal privilege vary substantially between federal and state courts. Federal courts apply common-law privilege rules under FRE 501, while many states have codified specific privileges (e.g., journalist shield laws) that have no federal equivalent.

Landmark Cases

Upjohn Co. v. United States(1981)

Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 U.S. 383 (1981)

Rejected the narrow "control group" test for corporate attorney-client privilege, holding that communications between corporate counsel and lower-level employees are protected when made for the purpose of obtaining legal advice.

Swidler & Berlin v. United States(1998)

Swidler & Berlin v. United States, 524 U.S. 399 (1998)

Held that attorney-client privilege survives the death of the client, rejecting the argument that a deceased client's communications should be disclosed in a criminal investigation.

Clark v. United States(1933)

Clark v. United States, 289 U.S. 1 (1933)

Established the crime-fraud exception to attorney-client privilege, holding that the privilege does not extend to communications made in furtherance of a crime or fraud.

Attorney-Client Privilege vs. Work Product Doctrine

Attorney-Client PrivilegeWork Product Doctrine
Protects confidential communicationsProtects litigation preparation materials
Applies only to attorney-client communicationsApplies to materials prepared by or for attorney
Absolute protection (with narrow exceptions)Qualified protection for ordinary work product
Waived by disclosure to any third partyNot waived by disclosure to non-adversaries
Crime-fraud exceptionSubstantial need + undue hardship can overcome
Belongs to the clientBelongs to the attorney

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the elements of attorney-client privilege?

Attorney-client privilege requires: (1) a communication, (2) made between privileged persons (attorney and client), (3) in confidence, (4) for the purpose of obtaining or providing legal assistance. All four elements must be present, and the privilege belongs to the client, who alone can waive it.

How is attorney-client privilege waived?

Privilege is waived by voluntary disclosure of the communication to a third party outside the privilege, by failing to assert the privilege in a timely manner, or by placing the communication at issue (such as raising an advice-of-counsel defense). Inadvertent disclosure may or may not waive privilege depending on the steps taken to prevent and rectify the disclosure.

What is the crime-fraud exception to attorney-client privilege?

The crime-fraud exception provides that attorney-client privilege does not protect communications made for the purpose of planning or committing a crime or fraud. The party seeking to invoke the exception must make a prima facie showing that the client was engaged in or planning criminal or fraudulent activity and that the communication furthered that activity.

Does attorney-client privilege survive the client's death?

Yes, attorney-client privilege generally survives the death of the client. The Supreme Court confirmed this in Swidler & Berlin v. United States (1998), holding that the privilege continues after death to encourage full and frank communication during the attorney-client relationship.

Related Terms

Work Product Doctrine

Evidence

The work product doctrine protects materials prepared by or for an attorney in anticipation of litig...

Discovery

Procedure

Discovery is the pretrial process by which parties obtain information and evidence from each other a...

Deposition

Procedure

A deposition is a form of discovery in which a witness gives sworn testimony outside of court, typic...

Relevance

Evidence

Evidence is relevant if it has any tendency to make a fact of consequence more or less probable than...

Practice This in a Mock Trial

Apply your knowledge of this term in a realistic courtroom simulation

Start a Mock Trial